Question 23
InsuranceMr. Lawal insured his warehouse against burglary but it was later gutted by fire. This implies that
- A.the loss should be borne by the insurer
- B.Mr. Lawal is liable only for half of the estimated loss
- C.the insurer should make a consolation payment for the loss
- D.the loss should be borne by Mr. Lawal.
Show the answer and explanation
Answer: D (the loss should be borne by Mr. Lawal.)
Explanation
The policy covered burglary, not fire, so the insurer pays nothing and Mr. Lawal bears the loss.